Uniloc

Type: Company
Name: Uniloc
First reported Sep 18 2014 - Updated Sep 18 2014 - 1 reports

Hiding in Plain Sight: Analyzing Requests for Patent Damages Do-Overs Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c)(1)

William C. Rooklidge is a partner at Jones Day in Irvine, Calif., who practices intellectual property litigation and related counseling, focusing on patent infringement trial and appellate litigation.Matthew J. Silveira is an associate in the San Francisco ... [Published Bureau of National Affairs - Sep 18 2014]
Entities: Patent, Federal, Testimony
First reported Sep 16 2014 - Updated Sep 17 2014 - 1 reports

Important Damages Opinion: VirnetX v. Cisco and Apple

By Jason Rantanen VirnetX, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2014)  Virnetx v Cisco Panel: Prost (author) and Chen Plaintiffs VirnetX and Science Applications International Corporation obtained a successful verdict against Apple based on infringement ... [Published Patent Law Blog (Patently-O) - Sep 16 2014]
First reported Sep 11 2014 - Updated Sep 11 2014 - 1 reports

Patent Application Titled "Device-Specific Content Delivery" Published Online

By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Life Science Weekly -- According to news reporting originating from Washington, D.C., by NewsRx journalists, a patent application by the inventor Etchegoyen, Craig S. (Plano, TX), filed on November 7, 2013, was ... [Published Street Sweeper - Sep 11 2014]
Entities: Delivery, Uniloc, Luxembourg
First reported Aug 13 2014 - Updated Aug 13 2014 - 1 reports

Apple Vs. VirnetX: The Federal Circuit Will Affirm Judge Davis

Summary No error regarding Entire Market Value Rule. No error regarding Nash Bargaining System. No error in jury instructions. Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ) vs. VirnetX (NYSEMKT: VHC ) AppealI have reviewed both the appellant and appellee briefs and have ... [Published Seeking Alpha - Aug 13 2014]
First reported Jun 21 2014 - Updated Jun 21 2014 - 2 reports

Supreme Court Rules Against Patent Trolls

On Thursday the U.S. Supreme Court unanimouslydecided that ideas themselves can not be patented . As Wired notes , the ruling is a major blow to patenttrolls and "could prevent some of the most frivolous patent casesfrom moving forward."Reason TV reported ... [Published REASON Online - Jun 21 2014]
First reported Apr 24 2014 - Updated Apr 24 2014 - 1 reports

Transfer on Mandamus

By Dennis Crouch Since its 2008 TS Tech decision, the Federal Circuit has repeatedly received Mandamus requests to force transfer of patent infringement lawsuits – usually out of the Eastern District of Texas and – into other, more convenient, districts. ... [Published Patent Law Blog (Patently-O) - Apr 24 2014]
First reported Apr 22 2014 - Updated Apr 22 2014 - 1 reports

Richardson's no-password security in development

Ric Richardson, the Byron Bay inventor who went toe-to-toe with Microsoft in a massive patent battle and won, is raising funds for a computer security solution he says could be "much bigger" than his last one.Mr Richardson was one of the largest shareholders ... [Published Sydney Morning Herald - Apr 22 2014]

Quotes

...As the Ninth Circuit explained, “Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) requires the parties to disclose the identity of each expert witness "accompanied by a written report prepared and signed by the witness." Absent other direction from the court, a rebuttal report shall be filed 'within 30 days after the disclosure’ of the evidence that the expert is assigned...
...the accused product only where the patented feature creates the basis for customer demand or substantially creates the value of the component parts. "” Id., quoting Versata SoftwareSoftware Inc. v. SAP Am., Inc., 717 F 3d 1255, 1268 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (emphasis added by court).  This is due to the general requirement that damages must be actually attributable to the infringing features within a reasonable degree of precision. "
"In determining the royalty base, you should not use the value of the entire apparatus or product unless either: (1) the patented feature creates the basis for the customer's demand for the product, or the patented feature substantially creates the value of the other component parts of the product; or (2) the product in question constitutes the smallest salable unit containing the patented feature. "
trolls and "could prevent some of the most frivolous patent cases"

More Content

All (9) | News (5) | Reports (0) | Blogs (4) | Audio/Video (0) | Fact Sheets (0) | Press Releases (0)
sort by: Date | Relevance
Hiding in Plain Sight: Analyzing Requests for P... [Published Bureau of National Affairs - Sep 18 2014]
Important Damages Opinion: VirnetX v. Cisco and... [Published Patent Law Blog (Patently-O) - Sep 16 2014]
Patent Application Titled "Device-Specific Cont... [Published Street Sweeper - Sep 11 2014]
Apple Vs. VirnetX: The Federal Circuit Will Aff... [Published Seeking Alpha - Aug 13 2014]
Supreme Court Rules Against Patent Trolls [Published REASON Online - Jun 21 2014]
Supreme Court Rules Against Patent Trolls [Published Hit & Run - Jun 21 2014]
Transfer on Mandamus [Published Patent Law Blog (Patently-O) - Apr 24 2014]
Richardson's no-password security in development [Published Sydney Morning Herald - Apr 22 2014]
SlickEdit Inc. Defeats Uniloc USA Inc. in Paten... [Published Business Wire Technology News - Mar 05 2014]
1
Content Volume
Document Volume
Network
Network

Blogs

sort by: Date | Relevance
Important Damages Opinion: VirnetX v. Cisco and... [Published Patent Law Blog (Patently-O) - Sep 16 2014]
By Jason Rantanen VirnetX, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2014)  Virnetx v Cisco Panel: Prost (author) and Chen Plaintiffs VirnetX and Science Applications International Corporation obtained a successful verdict against Apple based on infringement ...
Supreme Court Rules Against Patent Trolls [Published Hit & Run - Jun 21 2014]
On Thursday the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously decided that ideas themselves can not be patented . As Wired notes , the ruling is a major blow to patenttrolls and "could prevent some of the most frivolous patent casesfrom moving forward." Reason ...
Transfer on Mandamus [Published Patent Law Blog (Patently-O) - Apr 24 2014]
By Dennis Crouch Since its 2008 TS Tech decision, the Federal Circuit has repeatedly received Mandamus requests to force transfer of patent infringement lawsuits – usually out of the Eastern District of Texas and – into other, more convenient, districts. ...
SlickEdit Inc. Defeats Uniloc USA Inc. in Paten... [Published Business Wire Technology News - Mar 05 2014]
MORRISVILLE, N.C.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--SlickEdit Inc. announces defeat of Uniloc USA, Inc. in an alleged patent infringement lawsuit. ...
1
Contact Us
Sales
Support


Freebase CC-BY Some image thumbnails are sourced from Freebase, licensed under CC-BY

Copyright (C) 2014 Silobreaker Ltd. All rights reserved.
The selection and placement of stories and images on any Silobreaker page are determined automatically by a computer program.
The time or date displayed reflects when an article was added to or updated in Silobreaker.